
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
latest_posts
- 1
IDF struck Iran's largest petrochemical plant, second facility hit in two days, Katz confirms - 2
Figure out How to Streamline Your Profits in Gold Speculation - 3
Esteem Stuffed Gaming Workstations to Consider - 4
Experts who once backed 'shaken baby' science now fight to free imprisoned caregivers - 5
Washington resident is infected with a different type of bird flu
'Home Alone' actor Joe Pesci said 'no' to this stunt until he saw a 9-year-old girl do it, says director Chris Columbus
Extremely Rare Snub-Nosed Monkey Was Just Born for the First Time Outside of Asia
An Extended time of Careful Nurturing: Individual Bits of knowledge on Bringing up Kids
Air India chief resigns 10 months after devastating Ahmedabad crash and amid mounting financial troubles
Eli Lilly weight-loss drug appears to suppress binge-eating signal, small study finds
A definitive Manual for Picking Electric Vehicle: Decision in favor of Your Number one
Involved Vehicles for Seniors: Track down the Best Picks for Solace and Dependability
ADHD drugs work, but not the way experts thought
Hamas hands over another body in the Gaza Strip












